ISSN 2413-7642

 

A I.O. Derevianko, candidate of agricultural sciences, lecturer

N.Р. Turchynova, candidate of agricultural sciences, associate professor

Kharkiv National Agrarian University nd. a. V.V. Dokuchaev,

Kharkiv, Ukraine.

 

Selection Value Of Samples Spring Barley For Dry Resistance In The Conditions Of The Eastern Part Of The Forest Steppe Of Ukraine

The results of three annual studies on the studied reaction of spring barley plants to the level of moisture supply during the growing season have already been covered. In order to study the diversity of collection samples of spring barley in response to drought, we used an index approach, which is widely used by foreign scientists. With the help of the seven most common of them. These are: drought susceptibility index, tolerance index, average yield, yield stability index, yield index, stress tolerance index and geometric mean yield. 37 samples of spring barley from the collection have already been evaluated to establish the selection value of these samples for drought resistance. According to the results of the evaluation of the collection of spring barley cuttings according to dry resistance indices, it has already been established that the samples: Vodohrai (UKR), Nutans 108 (RUS); Nutans 553 (RUS), Nutans 642 (RUS), Omskyi 90 (RUS), Orenburhskyi 35 (RUS), Karabalykskyi 43 (KAZ); Nutans 89 (KGZ) had a higher level of dry resistance compared to other samples from the collection. These samples can be involved in breeding programs to create competitive varieties of spring barley, which will be adapted to the conditions of the eastern part of the ForestSteppe of Ukraine.

Keywords: spring barley, selection, dry resistance, indices of dry resistance, tolerance, stress, adaptation.

 

REFERENCES

  1. State Statistics Committee of Ukraine. (2020). Retrieved from http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/operativ/operativ12.20
  2. Kozachenko R., Zymohliad O.V., Vasko N.I.,
    Solonechnyi P.M., Vazhenina O.Ie., Solonechna O.V., & Naumov O.H. (2020). The level and variability of valuable economic characteristics of spring barley depending on the genotype and hydrothermal conditions. Breeding and seed production,118, 22 –34.
  3. Esmaeil Gholinezhad, Reza Darvishzadeh, & Iraj Bernousi. (2014). Evaluation of Drought Tolerance Indices for Selection of Confectionery Sunflower (Helianthus anuus L.) Landraces under Various Environmental Conditions. Not Bot HortiAgrobo, 42(1), 187–201.
  4. Hudzenko V.M., Vasylkivskyi S.P., Demydov O.A., Polishchuk T.P., & Babii O.O. (2017). Selection of spring barley to increase productive and adaptive potential. Breeding and seed production, 111, 51–61.
  5. Gallais A., & Neveu A. (2015). Changement climatique et production agricole. Retrieved from http:// www.inra.fr.
  6. Giancarla V., Madosa E., Ciulca S., Ciulca A., Petolescu C., & Bitea N. (2010). Assessment of drought tolerance in some barley genotypes cultivated in West part of Romania. of Horticulture, Forestry and Biotechnology, 14(3), 114–118.
  7. Majid Khayatnezhad, Mohammad Zaefizadeh, & Aliakbar (2011). Eimani. Selection of Useful Index for Drought Stress Tolerance in Durum Wheat Genotypes.Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 9 (2), 189–194.
  8. Akçura, F. Partigoç, & Y. Kaya. (2011). Evaluating of Drought stress Tolerance based on selection indices in Turkish bread wheat landraces. The Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, 21(4), 700–709.
  9. Reza Mohammadi, & Abdolvahab Abdulahi. (2017). Evoluation of Durum Wheat genotypes based on Drought Tolerance indices under different levels of Drought stress. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 62 (1), 1–14.
  10. Mohammad Reza Naghavi, Alireza Pour, & Marouf Khalili. (2013). Evaluation of Drought Tolerance Indices for Screening Some of Corn (Zea mays L.) Cultivars under Environmental Conditions.Not Sci Biol, 5(3), 388–393.
  11. Esmaeil Gholinezhad, Reza Darvishzadeh, & Iraj Bernousi. (2014). Evaluation of Drought Tolerance Indices for Selection of Confectionery Sunflower (Helianthus anuus L.) Landraces under Various Environmental Conditions. Not Bot HortiAgrobo, 42(1), 187–201.
  12. Talebi R., Fayaz F., & Naji A.M. (2009). Effective selection criteria for assessing drought stress tolerance in durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.). General and Applied Plant Physiology, 35, 1–2, 64–74.
  13. Allahdou M. (2012). Evaluation of resistance to drought in tritipyrum lines using drought tolerance indices. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences, 3, 3, 461–465.
  14. Darabad G. R. (2014). Evaluating the best indicators and identifying the most tolerant varieties to draught in potato varieties. International journal of biosciences, 4, 8, 189 – 195.
  15. Safavi S. M., & Safavi A.S. (2015). Evaluation of drought tolerance in sunflower (Helianthus annus L.) under non stress and drought stress conditions. Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Sciences, 6, 1, 578–584.
  16. Rozhkov A.O., Puzik V.K., Kalenska S.M., & Popov S.I. (2016). Research in agronomy: textbook, book one / ed. A.O. Rozhkov. Kharkiv: Maidan.
  17. Holova T.H. (2009). Reaction of spring barley varieties to changing growing conditions. Works on applied botany, genetics and breeding, 165, 95–99.
  18. Dolzhenko D.O., Kryvobochek Y.Y., & Bobachenko V.Y. (2009). Creation of new source material for breeding naked barley. Nyva Povolzhia, 3 (12), 27–31.
  19. Tykhonenko D.H., & Dehtiarov Yu.V. (2016). Soil cover of the experimental field «ROHANSKOHO STATSIONARU» Kharkiv NAU nd.a. V.V. Dokuchaev. Herald KhNAU. Soil science, 2, 5–13.
  20. Darabad G.R. (2014). Evaluating the best indicators and identifying the most tolerant varieties to draught in potato varieties. International Journal of Biosciences, 4, 8, 189–195.
  21. Fisher R.A., & Maurer R. (1978). Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars Grain yield responses. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 5, 897–912.
  22. Rosielle A.A., & Hamblin J. (1981). Theoretical Aspects of Selection for Yield in Stress and Non Stress Environments. Crop Science, 21 (6), 943–946.
  23. Ribaut J. & Poland D. (1999). Molecular approaches for the genetic improvement of cereals for stable production in water-limited environments. Strategic Planning Workshop held at CIMMYT. Mexico D. F.: CIMMYT.
  24. Bouslama M., & Schapaufh W. (1984). Stress tolerance in soybeans. Part I: Evaluation of three screening techniques for heat and drought tolerance. Crop Science, 24, 933–937.
  25. Selianynov H.H. (1930). On the issue of classification of agricultural crops by climatic criteria. Proceedings of agricultural meteorology, 21, 2, 28–42.

 



⇧
⇩